Tag Archives: government

Fiscal Cliff Talks Underway; Both Sides Upbeat

Negotiations on the Fiscal Cliff have started, and both sides are sounding positive. According to the Washington Post:

The four Republican and Democratic leaders of the House and Senate were unanimous after the initial round of talks in saying they were confident that they and the White House could agree on measures to raise federal revenue and cut spending before a Jan. 1 deadline, when draconian provisions originally designed to force a compromise are scheduled to take effect.

The stock market was cheered by the positive tone of the news, with the S&P 500 index closing up by half a percentage point today, after having trended downward since the election on November 6.


Growth in Federal Government Employees Pales Next to State and Local

When people complain about how much government has grown, their harshest criticism usually is reserved for the federal government. In reality, the number of federal government employees hasn’t grown quickly at all, compared with state and local.

Based on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of federal government employees has grown at an average annual rate of only 0.4 percent since 1955, from 2.3 million employees to 2.8 million.

Local government, on the other hand, has grown at a rate of 2.4 percent per year, from 3.5 million employees in 1955 to 14.1 million in August 2012. State government growth averaged 2.6 percent per year, from 1.1 million to 5 million.

Of course, number of government employees isn’t the only way to measure government, and using other measures might yield different conclusions. But numbers of employees hardly suggests out-of-control growth of federal government.

Credit Cards and Irrationality – Protecting Us from Our Brains

Human beings are rational.

It’s a basic assumption of economics. Humans are rational beings. Homo economici. We don’t intentionally try to make ourselves worse off.

In his book How We Decide, Jonah Lehrer cites a wide range of psychological, behavioral, and economic research to argue that emotions guide many of our economic decisions. He makes the case that emotions are not just irrational feelings of love and hate, but instead are the result of how the human brain is wired.

And these emotions can cause us to do things that are bad for us.

Take credit cards. Buying things with cash activates a part of the brain called the insula. We actually feel a sort of subconscious pain – emotional discomfort – when we spend cash, since we’re physically giving up something.

When we pay by credit cards rather, however, our brains don’t feel the same sense of loss. Brain scans show that paying with credit cards reduces activity in the insula, causing us to feel less discomfort about the purchase. We literally feel it costs less with credit than with cash.

Basic economic theory says there shouldn’t be a difference between paying by cash or by credit card. Both involve the same loss, so we should view both the same. If anything we should feel worse about paying by credit card, since that could result in having to pay interest or late fees, .

But that’s not how the brain sees it. Which is why so many otherwise rational people get in over their heads with credit cards.

I remember when I was in college and got my first credit cards. Even as an arguably intelligent and sensible person, I still fell into the trap and over-extended myself. Fortunately for me, I got a steady job and eventually was able to pay off my debt. But it took many years to do so. If anything had gone wrong before I did – if I’d gotten sick or had lost my job – I could easily have fallen into a vicious cycle of debt dependent. And if that had happened, I doubt that I would now be here writing about the dangers of credit card debt.

Credit card companies know about the brain’s weaknesses and use every trick they can – low introductory rates, fine print, hidden fees – to take advantage of them. And they’re really good at it. So good in fact that millions of Americans get into credit card trouble every year.

It’s easy to say that this is their problem. They got themselves into trouble. Let them get themselves out of it. And there’s some truth to that. Society can’t take responsibility for every bad decision. Choices have consequences. People need to learn that and take responsibility for their own actions.

But a good case can be made for trying to prevent the worst abuses, particularly since neuroscience research – actual brain scans – tells us that it is due to the very way the human brain works.

From a self-interest perspective, having so many people getting into credit crises also isn’t good for society as a whole. People who get in over their heads aren’t able to pay their bills, are likely to have psychological problems, will have more trouble holding on to their jobs, and will have difficulty caring for their children. This makes it more likely that their kids will grow up to have problems in life as well, thus perpetuating the problem.

Fortunately, the U.S. government has been taking steps to curb the worst credit card abuses. The recently-establish Consumer Finance Protection Bureau has taken an aggressive stand against credit card companies that use unethical means to prey on consumers.

I’ve always been opposed to unnecessary government regulation and involvement in the economy. Government regulation imposes a burden on businesses and on society, unless there’s a good and overarching need for it.

In this case there is. There are situations where people do need to be protected from themselves, and this is one of them.

Sometimes people need to be protected from the flaws in our own brains.

It’s only rational.